Karl
Marx - The Preface ‘A Contribution to a Critique of Political Economy’ (1859)
In the social production of their life, men enter
into definite relations that are indispensable and independent of their will,
relations of production which correspond to a definite stage of development of
their material productive forces. The sum total of these relations of
production constitutes the economic structure of society, the real foundation,
on which rises a legal and political superstructure and to which correspond
definite forms of social consciousness. The mode of production of material life
conditions the social, political and intellectual life process in general. It
is not the consciousness of men that determines their being, but, on the
contrary, their social being that determines their consciousness.
At a certain stage of their development, the
material productive forces of society come in conflict with the existing
relations of production, or — what is but a legal expression for the same thing
— with the property relations within which they have been at work hitherto.
From forms of development of the productive forces these relations turn into
their fetters.
Then begins an epoch of social revolution. With the
change of the economic foundation the entire immense superstructure is more or
less rapidly transformed. In considering such transformations a distinction
should always be made between the material transformation of the economic
conditions of production, which can be determined with the precision of natural
science, and the legal, political, religious, aesthetic or philosophic — in
short, ideological forms in which men become conscious of this conflict and
fight it out…
No social order ever perishes before all the
productive forces for which there is room in it have developed; and new, higher
relations of production never appear before the material conditions of their
existence have matured in the womb of the old society itself. Therefore mankind
always sets itself only such tasks as it can solve; since, looking at the
matter more closely, it will always be found that the tasks itself arises only
when the material conditions of its solution already exist or are at least in
the process of formation.
In broad outlines Asiatic,
ancient, feudal, and modern bourgeois modes of production can be designated as
progressive epochs in the economic formation of society. The bourgeois
relations of production are the last antagonistic form of the social process of
production — antagonistic not in the sense of individual antagonisms, but of
one arising form the social conditions of life of the individuals; at the same
time the productive forces developing in the womb of bourgeois society create
the material conditions for the solution of that antagonism. This social
formation brings, therefore, the prehistory of society to a close.