IGCSE History
Term 1
Term 2
Term 3
Term 4
Term 5
Forum
Coursework
Exams and Revision
Parents
Results
Shop

IGCSE History Exams

The Paris Peace Treaties

Look at the cartoon and then answer the questions which follow.

(a)  Describe what Georges Clemenceau wished to achieve at the Paris peace conference. [5] answer

(b)  Why did Wilson fail to persuade the other victorious powers that his Fourteen Points should form the basis of the peace settlement? [7] answer

(c) Was the Treaty of Versailles fair? Explain your answer. [8] answer

 

Suggested Answers

(a) Using the stimulus material you will have noticed that Clemenceau was nicknamed the ‘tiger’. Concentrate on his desire for revenge and compensation and explain this motivation in terms of the enormous French suffering in a war that was largely fought in France. Clemenceau wished to weaken Germany (divide her, make her pay reparations etc.) so as to prevent a future invasion of France. [back to questions]

(b) You need to begin by outlining the essence of Wilson’s Fourteen Points. They were an idealistic set of principles designed to prevent future wars. You should notice that the Fourteen Points were not ignored. The LoN was set up, Alsace and Lorraine were returned to France, an independent Poland was set up with access to the sea etc. (see McAleavy p.21) However, not all the points were acted upon because (and bear in mind that this also explains why the settlement was a general compromise): (i) The pressure of time. Fear of communism in particular meant that had to act quickly and power vacuum in central-southern Europe (further help) (ii) Conflict of Interest.  (further help) National interests were more important than international ideals  e.g. the protection of the British Empire was more important than self-determination.  [back to questions]

(c) Remember this is an evaluative essay and you must consider both sides of the argument (p.28 of McAleavy gives you basic points and you can get further help on this site). You could answer this by reference to the opposing views of JM Keynes who thought it unfair (undeserved war guilt clause, inconsistent application of self-determination etc.) and Sally Marks who thought it was fair (could have been a lot worse, Versailles was relatively restrained, basis of German future economic and military strength untouched etc.). Remember to produce supporting evidence for each of the views expressed. The very best responses have a clear conclusion that explains why one set of arguments is more persuasive than another. [back to questions]