|
|
SOCIAL
The law said that they were three estates, although there were actually 5 “classes.” People’s rights were divided into these 3 estates, which comprised of maybe two or three classes. The first and second estate had many financial privileges, therefore the poor and poverty stricken third estate had to pay more in the long run than the richer second and first estate. Essentially, the richer people ended up paying a lot less tax than the poor peasants. This was very obviously unfair, and resulted in awful poverty. The biggest economical problem with the estates was the exemption of some taxes that some people in higher estates enjoyed. A village in northern France issued a list of complaints to the government and one of their points was:
The
above table shows just how unfair the social system was. People in the first
estate had their own law courts, and therefore were not tried in the same way as
others. They were exempt from lots of taxes, even though they were the richest.
The second estate was in between, exempt from some taxes, sometimes had their
own law courts, and were given titles by the king. Peasants had to pay all their
taxes, even though they were the poorest. In relation to the economics, the
social system was incredibly unfair, and people were just completely exasperated
with it, as they could not see the logic behind it. Because
of the estates people thought society was very unfair. Predictably, the peasants
and town workers of the third estate especially believed this, because they did
not benefit from the estate system. In the middle ages, nobles had been soldiers
who fought for France in wartime. The clergy, or the church runners, ran the
country’s education and controlled religion. This was important work, and in
return, the king gave nobles and clergy their own estates and their own
privileges. But it was no longer the middle ages, and these important people
were gradually becoming less and less important. This was yet another reason why
French people thought that the system of estates was completely obsolete and
unjust. Without money, the peasants would never have power. Without power, they would never have money...
|
|